Should & Ought To

The "Twin Modals" of English advice, obligation, and expectation. They are 90% interchangeable, but the magic lies in the 10% difference.

🤔 Advice
⚖️ Duty
🔮 Probability

🏗️ The Structural Blueprint

The biggest mistake learners make is with the word "TO". Interact with the builder below to see how the grammar changes between the two forms. Notice how "Ought" is glued to "to", while "Should" stands alone.

Tap to Build a Sentence

You should study.

Rule #1: No "To" for Should

"Should" is a pure modal verb. It connects directly to the base verb. Never say "Should to".

💡 Pro Tip:

In negative forms, Should not is easy. Ought not to is clunky and rare! Native speakers almost always prefer "Shouldn't".

📊 The Formality Spectrum

While meanings overlap, the "vibe" is different. This chart compares how formal or forceful different advice verbs feel.

Scale based on general linguistic consensus for standard English.

🎲 Probability & Expectation

When used for prediction ("It should rain"), how certain are we? Compare "Should/Ought to" against other modals.

Takeaway: Use "Should/Ought to" when you are about 90% sure because you have logical reasons (e.g., "The train left 10 mins ago, so it should be here soon").

🔍 Usage Scenarios

Click the tabs below to explore the three main "jobs" these verbs do.

Subjective vs. Objective

This is the subtle secret!

  • SHOULD Subjective (My Opinion): "I think you should wear the red dress." (It's my taste).
  • OUGHT TO Objective (External Fact): "You ought to wear a coat." (Because it is freezing outside - not just my opinion).
💊

"You ought to take this medicine."

(It's the doctor's order, not just a friendly tip)

The Regret Slider (Past Tense)

How do we talk about mistakes in the past? We use the "Perfect Modal" structure:
Should / Ought to + HAVE + Past Participle

Slide to travel from Future advice to Past regret.

FUTURE / PRESENT PAST (REGRET)

Scenario: Studying for a test

"You should study."

Advice for the future.

⚡ Quick Check

Can you use "should" without "to"?